Test report DSG-9231 · Rev B · tested October 10, 2026
Foundries & ManufacturingDevice under test
Samsung Cuts 2nm Chip Area by Up to 14%, SK Hynix Separates Peripheral Circuits
Samsung reports up to 14% area reduction at 2nm-class nodes; SK Hynix is separating peripheral circuits from memory arrays in its next-generation designs.
- Read
- 3 min
- Words
- 669
- Node
- 20nm
- Operator
- Elena Vasquez
Spec summary
- Samsung cut chip area by up to 14% with 2nm-class process technology
- SK Hynix is moving peripheral circuits to a separate location from memory cell arrays
- Both moves were reported as part of the 2nm technology competition between the Korean chipmakers
Samsung has reduced chip area by up to 14% with its 2nm-class process technology, while SK Hynix is restructuring its designs by moving peripheral circuits to a separate location on the die. The two developments mark a new phase in the 2nm technology war between Korea's largest semiconductor manufacturers.
The area reduction, reported by finance.biggo.com under the headline "2nm Technology War: Samsung Cuts Area by Up to 14%, SK Hynix Moves to Separate Peripheral Circuits," signals how foundries and memory makers alike are squeezing more dies per wafer as they push past the 3nm node.
What does the 14% area cut mean for manufacturing?
In logic manufacturing, area is cost. A die that shrinks by 14% yields proportionally more candidate die sites per wafer, assuming defect density holds steady. At leading-edge nodes, where wafer costs are the highest in the industry, even a single-digit percentage of area savings translates into meaningful margin gains.
Samsung's figure — up to 14% — is the most concrete number disclosed in the report. The company has been racing to establish its 2nm process as a credible alternative in advanced foundry competition, and area efficiency is one of the primary metrics customers use when comparing nodes.
The phrase "up to" matters. Area gains in process marketing typically apply to specific cell types or circuit structures, not uniformly across an entire system-on-chip. Customers evaluating migration to a 2nm-class node will need to validate the gains against their own block-level implementations.
Why is SK Hynix separating peripheral circuits?
SK Hynix, primarily a memory manufacturer rather than a logic foundry, is pursuing a different architectural lever: moving peripheral circuits away from the memory cell arrays.
The approach matters for DRAM and NAND scaling. In conventional designs, peripheral circuitry — sense amplifiers, wordline drivers, control logic — sits alongside or beneath the memory array, constraining how tightly cells can be packed. By relocating those circuits, the memory maker frees area for storage cells and can in principle improve density and signal integrity independently of lithography advances.
The technique echoes the broader industry shift toward three-dimensional integration, where logic and memory elements are stacked or partitioned rather than laid out side by side on a single plane.
How does this fit the 2nm timeline?
The report frames both companies' moves as part of a "technology war" at the 2nm-class node. Samsung has committed publicly to ramping 2nm production in the mid-2020s, with mass production targeted for around 2025 and wider application across mobile and HPC products thereafter.
For SK Hynix, the immediate application of separated peripheral circuits would land in next-generation DRAM generations, where the company competes directly with Samsung's memory division and with Micron.
Who benefits downstream?
Area reductions and architectural changes at the 2nm node affect three groups:
- Fabless customers, who gain denser implementations for mobile and AI silicon if the area claims hold in production;
- Memory buyers, including server and datacenter OEMs, if SK Hynix's peripheral-circuit separation improves density or power characteristics;
- Equipment and materials suppliers, whose tool orders track each node transition.
What remains unverified?
The source report provides the headline figures but limited engineering detail. Key questions left open include:
- Which specific process generation delivers the 14% area reduction, and against what baseline;
- Whether the figure reflects transistor-level scaling, standard-cell optimization, or design-technology co-optimization (DTCO) techniques;
- Which SK Hynix product generation will first ship with separated peripheral circuits;
- Whether either company has qualified the technologies with lead customers.
Both companies routinely disclose fuller technical details at industry venues such as the IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology and Circuits and the International Electron Devices Meeting.
The stakes are straightforward. Advanced-node capacity is scarce and expensive, and every percentage point of area efficiency determines who wins leading-edge orders. With Samsung cutting area by up to 14% and SK Hynix rearchitecting its dies, Korea's two semiconductor giants have both raised the pace of the 2nm race.
via Google News: HBM memory (Source)
More from Elena Vasquez
Show full bio
Senior reporter covering industry trends and analytics at Die Signal.
247 articles
Same lot · LOT-C1C6
- DSG-112245nmSynopsys reports 22% NPU die-area shrink on Samsung 2nm
- DSG-468914nmSamsung's 2nm Yield Nears 60% in Push Against TSMC
- DSG-22987nmSamsung Foundry Reaches 60 Percent Yield on 2nm Process
- DSG-44257nmMicron Closes Gap on SK Hynix in Global DRAM Rankings
- DSG-701410nmSamsung Projects Foundry Customer Base to Quadruple by 2029